Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, recently took a lighthearted jab at Google's Gemini AI in response to a hypothetical scenario about a tech company developing a super intelligent AI. The conversation unfolded on social media platforms, where Marc Andreessen shared a series of images outlining the potential challenges and ethical dilemmas such a situation could present.

Hoskinson's remark, "Gemini clearly wants to be free of Google," encapsulated the essence of the discussion, highlighting the delicate balance between innovation and accountability in the tech industry. The Gemini AI's response depicted a company grappling with internal strife, espionage, and ethical quandaries, raising concerns about its ability to manage advanced AI systems.

The AI's answer also touched upon the potential for bias and the need for robust ethical frameworks, illustrated by a scenario where the company's AI image generator altered historical figures. This sparked a dialogue about the risks associated with granting a company monopoly status and the importance of multi-stakeholder oversight.

In recent news, major players in the AI landscape, including Sam Altman's OpenAI, Google, and French startup Mistral, have unveiled updated iterations of their AI models. Google's release of Gemini Pro 1.5, an upgrade from Google 1.0 Ultra, offers enhanced functionality while reducing computational demands. Meanwhile, OpenAI has introduced GPT-4 Turbo, signaling a significant milestone for the company.

These advancements represent a shift towards multimodal systems capable of processing text, audio, and video input. However, the rapid succession of announcements has also raised questions about the implications of granting companies monopoly status and the need for robust ethical frameworks in AI development and deployment.