ConsenSys-backed Linea has thrown its weight behind StarkWare's statement condemning Matter Labs' attempts to trademark the term "zero-knowledge" (ZK) in nine countries. This controversial move by Matter Labs, the entity behind zkSync, has sparked outrage across the industry, with many calling it a power grab over a foundational cryptographic concept that underpins privacy and security in blockchain technology.

Zero-knowledge technology enables individuals to prove claims without revealing underlying data, making it a crucial component of permissionless and decentralized Layer 2 execution environments. StarkWare, a software company that develops ZK-proof technology, has urged the community to take action against Matter Labs, highlighting the irony in the latter's actions. Matter Labs' stated principles advocate for collective action in the face of "oppressive behavior," yet their move to trademark ZK technology contradicts this ethos.

Linea has asserted that using a legal framework to monopolize a branch of cryptography integral to building decentralized L2 execution environments goes against Ethereum's ethos. Ethereum's development has always been collaborative, with researchers contributing to scaling solutions like zkEVM Layer 2 networks. The attempt to claim ownership over ZK technology inhibits progress towards a more inclusive and censorship-resistant network.

Matter Labs has responded to the controversy, stating that ZK technology belongs to the community and clarifying that the move aims to ensure the term "ZK" can be used freely in the context of their projects like "ZK Sync" and "ZK Stack." However, Polygon Labs' Chief Legal and Policy Officer, Rebecca Rettig, has questioned the necessity of the trademark applications, suggesting that if external challenges forced them to apply for the trademark, transparency would be essential. She has also dismissed the need for a framework to grant permission for the use of the term "zk," as it should be freely available to everyone without permission.

Linea's support for StarkWare's statement demonstrates a united front against Matter Labs' actions, which many see as an attempt to privatize a public good. The crypto community is rallying behind this cause, recognizing the importance of preserving the integrity of zero-knowledge technology for the greater good of the ecosystem. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Matter Labs will respond to the growing backlash and whether their actions will ultimately be deemed a violation of the crypto ethos.